Activity
The teacher discusses sounding out the letter sound “ph” and
“gh.” The teacher is the model for the students, modeling through her
discussion and then when reading aloud to the students. The students then work in groups, being
models for each other because the students are in pods where everyone has a
different strength, but one of the students has strong reading skills already
to be the main model during group work.
The teacher will continually remind the students as they are reading in
groups that they can do this and that it is not much harder than what they
worked on last week. This will give the
students the confidence to continue to read and really learn the concepts of
the “ph” and “gh” sounds. After
sufficient practice, the students will be able to read aloud to the class with
a book they know is at the right level for their reading level, promoting
self-regulation.
Explanation
For this model/activity, I chose to use Social Cognitive
Theory to modify my model. I did not
have to change that much about my model for this week, because my activity
already had quite a bit of social cognitive theory aspects in it already. Social Cognitive Theory, developed by
Bandura, focuses on learning through observation and modeling, as well the
belief in one’s own abilities. The
teacher is the model at the beginning of the activity; during her discussion
with the students, she is modeling what she wants her students to do. Because the students are learning by
observing the teacher, they are using “vicarious learning” (174). The teacher is a “live model,” which is where
the students can learn directly and get immediate feedback. This way, if the
students are confused about anything, the teacher can fix the misconception or
explain the concept more clearly. Having
the teacher as the model at the beginning is also conducive for the students to
learn because the teacher is “viewed as competent…[and] more likely to be
imitated [because] he or she is someone with high status” (175). This causes the students to feel confident in
learning because they know that their teacher knows what he or she is talking
about. The book specifically states
that, “teachers provide an excellent example of models in the classroom”
(175). This tells us that it is a good
idea for the teacher to model the learning because the students will want to
imitate the behavior from their teacher before a person who does not appear to
know what they are doing. This is why,
during group time, the teacher set up the pods in the classroom, making sure
that there are varying reading levels at each, providing another model who does
not have the most knowledge on the subject, but might have more than others in the
class. This would improve the
self-efficacy of the student who is better at reading, because they would
realize that they are able to do the reading.
Another way to help boost self-efficacy, which is “an individual’s
belief about his or her capabilities for success,” would be for the teacher to
repeatedly tell students that they can succeed in this activity and that they
can read those sounds. Seeing their
peers succeed in making these sounds and seeing them read could give the struggling
students the confidence to “believe that they too can be successful”
(178). Students will be able to
self-regulate when they pick the book they will want to read aloud and choose a
book that is at an appropriate reading level.
This will also give the student more confidence because they will know
that they can read that book.
Sarah Isaacson
You have some very interesting points here. The Social Cognitive Theory is an important theory to be aware. I think it’s very important that as teachers, we understand that one of the most powerful learning techniques is that students learn a lot by observing. I really like the activity that you provided because it puts an emphasis on learning through observation and modeling, however in some ways I think it’s a bit optimistic to think that students will learn to read just by observing the teacher. I do agree that students can learn by observing a model, however I think don’t think reading quite fits under this category. Learning to read requires a lot of repetition of sounds and sounding out. I’m not quite sure a student would be able to read just by being able to observe their teacher. However, I do like the fact that you have the students break off into different pods based off different reading levels. This way the teacher can walk around the room and see who is struggling and who is doing well. Overall, I like the theory you used behind your activity, I just think that another specific activity might work better for your theory.
ReplyDelete-Madeline Leslie